Science denialism was already present in the historic moment of the “Vaccine Revolt”. From this perspective, the rebellion against the smallpox vaccine, (No comma) is similar to the present moment, when during the Covid pandemic, (No comma) science is increasingly demoralized. Thus, it is necessary to think about scientific denialthereremains, since the rejection established by the population and the health crisis constitute the biggest problems of this pernicious scenario of rejection. (Improve presentation of initial discussions)
(Good cohesive strategy) At the outset, it is notable to highlight that the rejection of vaccination, as well as health standards, (No comma) are extremely harmful to pandemic control. Proof of this lies in the data on contamination generated by the denial of effectiveness and non-compliance with preventive measures. Furthermore, it is worth highlighting the health crisis, caused by fake news and the denial of The pandemic. This context involves the sharing of misinformation, encouraging the use of non-recommended medications and discrediting distancing. Therefore, it is urgent to recognize that this process resulted in the demoralization of science, much of it founded by a mass influenced by the opinion of the president of the republic. (Define and explore discussions more productively)
(Good cohesive strategy) In order to change scientific denials, it is the duty of government bodies, as well as the Ministry of Health(Very well. Introduced the agent) transmit scientifically proven information to the population, through official media. Furthermore, it is up to these The creation of measures to assess the veracity of facts, before their disclosure (Comma) to to to prevent the spread of fake news. Only then would the population trust science again, as study is always the best answer.
Broker reviews
Define and further explore discussions throughout development. Avoid a superficial approach to the topic. Don’t forget to practice your writing.
Skills assessed
Competence Grade Reason Mastery of the formal written modality 160 Level 4 – Demonstrates good command of the formal written modality of the Portuguese language and choice of register, with few grammatical deviations and writing conventions. Understand the proposal and apply concepts from various areas of knowledge to develop the dissertation-argumentative text in prose 160 Level 4 – Develops the topic through consistent argumentation and presents a good command of the dissertation-argumentative text, with proposition, argumentation and conclusion. Select, relate, organize and interpret information in defense of a point of view 120 Level 3 – Presents information, facts and opinions related to the topic, limited to the arguments of motivating and poorly organized texts, in defense of a point of view. Knowledge of the linguistic mechanisms necessary to construct an argument 200 Level 5 – Articulates the parts of the text well and presents a diverse repertoire of cohesive resources. Intervention proposal with respect to human rights 160 Level 4 – Well prepares an intervention proposal related to the topic and linked to the discussion developed in the text.
FINAL GRADE: 800
See below the grade related to each level Level 0 Grade 0 Level 1 Grade 40 Level 2 Grade 80 Level 3 Grade 120 Level 4 Grade 160 Level 5 Grade 200